Let’s say a compliance platform costs $12,000 annually. Is that expensive?
It’s all about what you’re replacing.
If $12,000 is spent to eliminate hundreds of hours collecting evidence in the complex technological world this could be money worth investing. If a company of seven could manually gather similar evidence in just the space of a few hours every month, the cost is quite different.
It is a great method to locate Vanta alternatives. Identifying the platform with the most features isn’t the only thing to consider. Determine how many hours and time these features will save your company.
The Break-Even Point for Automation
Automation of compliance isn’t necessarily good or bad. Its value varies with the size. Imagine a growing technology company with multiple cloud environments as well as various applications. Continuously gathering evidence manually could cause a significant operational burden. Integrations that monitor systems automatically and gather evidence could justly justify the expense.
Imagine a startup of 10 people getting ready to go through the initial SOC 2. audit. It could have a smaller infrastructure, and the collection of evidence could be handled with minimal automation.
This is an important distinction to consider in evaluating the pricing offered by Vanta. The capabilities of a modern platform are amazing, however they are only useful for organizations that require them.
Compare Architecture and not just Brands
Vanta Vs Drata is a comparison that could easily be a feature-by feature exercise. It is crucial to examine the services, features contract and quotes offered by both platforms. Both are reputable compliance platforms that concentrate on automation and integrations.
You’ll need to decide on something else first. Do you think your business is ready for an integration-driven compliance platform in any way? Some companies prefer continuous monitoring, automated evidence collection, and automated evidence collection. Others prefer to supply their own evidence, especially when the workload is low.
Vanta Competitors Don’t Follow the Same Model
Many well-known Vanta competitors compete within a similar automation-focused category. There are also platforms that are less heavy that focus on organization over large system connectivity.
CertAssist fits into this category. CertAssist was designed by internal auditors and compliance specialists. It organizes framework controls into a single workspace that allows for editing of guidelines for policy as well as evidence. Auditors can review the documents submitted using a read-only interface.
It intentionally doesn’t connect to operational systems nor create infrastructure agents. Customers can upload their own documentation.
Consideration of System Access in the Decision
Removing integrations has an obvious drawback: you have to gather evidence by hand.
This means that there is no need to integrate and the implementation of compliance is not dependent on any connection to the operating environment.
There is no universally superior architecture. Which tradeoff is right for your business?
CertAssist is geared towards teams comprising between five and 200 people and publishes its pricing rather than requiring for a sales meeting to get the beginning price. The initial price is $225 a month, which is comparable to the usual cost of $375 per month.
Let Complexity Take Its Place
What a startup with 10 employees requires today may differ at 500 or 100 employees.
While compliance is simple but a lighter platform might make sense. As the amount of employees, systems frameworks, and evidence requirements increase, the economy could eventually favor more automation. It’s better to let complex technology of compliance earn its place.
Don’t pay for fifty integrations just because they look impressive on a comparison chart. They’re worth it in situations where the task they take over is more costly than performing them manually.