Let’s suppose that a compliance system is worth $12,000 per year. How much is it?
It all depends on the item you’re replacing.
If the automation process eliminates hundreds of hours of tedious evidence collection in a tangled technology-driven environment, $12,000 could be a wise investment. The calculation would be different when a team of seven individuals could gather the same amount of evidence in just the time of a few minutes every month.
This is a great way to find Vanta alternatives. Do not begin by asking what platform comes with the most features. Ask your company about how these features will help you save time and money.
Automated Manufacturing is an End-of-Even
Automation of compliance isn’t always beneficial or harmful. Its value varies with the size. Imagine a company that is growing with multiple cloud environments as well as many applications. It is possible to manually collect evidence, which could be a significant operational burden. Integrations that monitor systems automatically and collect evidence could easily justify the cost.
Now think about a 10-person company that is preparing for its initial SOC 2. Consider a startup with 10 employees who are preparing for their first SOC 2.
Vanta pricing is based on this distinction. The capabilities of a sophisticated platform are amazing, however they can only be of value in the event that an organization requires them.
Compare Architecture and not just Brands
A search for Vanta vs Drata can quickly become a feature-by-feature exercise. The two platforms are built on automation and integration and therefore, companies seeking this method can benefit from comparison of the frameworks that are supported along with their integrations and services along with individual quotations and contracts.
You’ll have to decide on another thing first. Does your company want an integration-driven platform for compliance or not? Certain businesses would prefer continuous monitoring or automated evidence collection and automated evidence collection. Some businesses prefer to collect evidence on their own.
Vanta Competitors Do Not All Use the Same Model
Many famous Vanta competitors compete within the same automation-oriented category. The market also includes more lightweight platforms that focus on the organization of systems rather than a large amount of connectivity.
CertAssist is a part of this category. CertAssist was created by internal auditors and compliance experts. It organizes controls for frameworks into a single workspace that allows for editing of guidelines for policy as well as evidence. Auditors can review the evidence submitted through a read-only interface.
It deliberately does not connect to operating systems, nor create infrastructure agents. Customers can upload their own documentation.
Factor System Access to the Decision
It is clear that cutting off integrations could have disadvantages. Someone has to gather evidence by hand.
This means that there is no need for integration and the application of compliance doesn’t require any connection to the operating environment.
Neither architecture is universally superior. What is the best choice for your business?
CertAssist aims at teams of five to 200 employees and offers pricing information instead of having an actual sales call. Its stated launch price is $225 per month, compared with a regular price of $375 monthly.
Let Complexity Find Its Proper Place
Needs for startups today that has 10 employees aren’t necessarily the same as those of a company with 100 or 500 employees.
While compliance is simple an easy platform can be a good idea. As systems, employees, frameworks, and requirements for evidence grow, the economics will ultimately favor more automation. Let complexity take its place when purchasing compliance technology.
Don’t spend money on fifty integrations because they appear impressive on a comparison chart. Pay for them when manually doing the tasks they replace becomes the more expensive option.